Mr. Kemmler perhaps? Death's Dark Shadow?

FasterThanJesus wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 8:52 am I didn't even notice their website had changed from cubicle7 cubicle7games.

It's also changed from a .co.uk to a .com website. I guess that this is at least partly because of their move from the UK to Ireland.

I'm quite pleased to see these but I still think C7 needs to work out how they communicate these. Really Cubicle 7's site should be the one-stop for news on what they're releasing, but instead we keep finding out more from retailer sites and gossip sites. I agree. All in all WFRP fan sites and foru...

More accurately a blog post called 'FAQ #1', which addresses, what seem to me to be some low hanging fruit, is online. A downloadable PDF, which is what i was expecting, will come later when Cubicle7 have put a larger collection of these FAQ blog posts online.

More and more I'm giving up on this game, thinking of the sentiment somebody got from the social media I don't frequent, where the devs are said to come across as using the rules as guidelines only, rules to be ignored whenever they don't work. :x that wasn't sentiment, when i was still in the disc...

cameron wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 3:22 am there were rules for pushing horses in "the enemy within" pgs 6-7. wfrp1 rules but i think they translate smoothly into wfrp2.

is it ok just to copy-paste them here?

I seriously doubt it given that it is copyrighted material and given that it is for sale on DTRPG last time i looked.

Theo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 2:30 pm Great, thanks! I think this must be the stuff I vaguely remembered - I'll have a closer look at it. Is anyone still in touch with Didz?

I think it must be Didz posting occasionally as 'MrDidz' on the WRFP reddit thread.

Untenable.

As as kind of carry over from the 40k RPGs we have a house rrule, used in all Warhammer systems, that hits to the head does double damage. Because getting hit in the head is not good and its wise to invest in a helmet, or was, in RL as far as I know. Hmm.... if damage is done then yes, it can get s...

There were rules for damaging armour in WFRP first edition called 'armour has feelings too' by Graeme Davis. They were in the 'Warhammer Grimoire', and i seem to recall they were in a 'White Dwarf' too.

As far as i can see the only difference in the actual product* of the special edition is the 'special covers' ( which i don't like that much ). Am i wrong? * As opposed to the 'extras' like 'developer diaries' and an earlier PDF. You’re not wrong, I got the same impression from C7’s Facebook post. ...

Chuck wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2019 1:59 pm

totsuzenheni wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2019 9:50 am
Not to take this off topic, and without having the rules in front of me here, but couldn't those three rolls be rolled together?

You could, but if your strike doesn’t generate a critical you’ve wasted 2 of those 3 rolls.

Er... well, you know, it's not like the dice die.

As far as i can see the only difference in the actual product* of the special edition is the 'special covers' ( which i don't like that much ). Am i wrong?

* As opposed to the 'extras' like 'developer diaries' and an earlier PDF.

Chuck wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2019 8:56 am [ ... ] too many rolls -- one roll to strike, another to generate the crit effect, a third to determine hit location, UGH.

Not to take this off topic, and without having the rules in front of me here, but couldn't those three rolls be rolled together?

I've finally received the Starter Set and core book and I'm reading through the rules for the very first time, and already (lots of) questions pop up! (The rules seem to be a bit less clear compared to WFRP v1?) 1. Surprised condition: [ ... ] So, for example, lets say Character A attacks Character...

I've finally received the Starter Set and core book and I'm reading through the rules for the very first time, and already (lots of) questions pop up! (The rules seem to be a bit less clear compared to WFRP v1?) 1. Surprised condition: it says any opponent trying to attack a surprised character get...

Orin J. wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2019 10:52 amlike i said, it's not really compatible with the rest of the game system's execution. there's a lot about 4th edition that's "clever" but was clearly written in a vacuum from the rest of the rules system and it's kind of a shame.

To be fair that might be because this is 1st edition.

Later in the description of hiding on p. 69 is written: " A creature with an appropriate Silent Move skill may add a +10% modifier [ ... ] with Concealment skill may add a further +20%. " So i think the idea of hiding that the writers had in mind was of a character perhaps needing to move ...

FWIW, i was able to download them.

One suggestion you might like: Solkan is said to wield a brilliant silver scythe against Khorne during a war they fought. I incorporate the scythe as a prominent symbol of Solkan for that reason, because just like a scythe to wheat he smites indiscriminately, felling any and all who wrong him or th...